| |
|
| | | Fish and Wildlife Advisory News, August 2002
Note: The following summaries are based on articles from the press and from peer-reviewed publications, and they
represent the opinions of the original authors. The views of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, and
shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or
otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government.
Recent Advisory News
- FDA Panel Meets to Discuss Tuna -
According to an article in the Washington Post, an FDA advisory panel met for 3 days in late July and urged the FDA to advise pregnant women to restrict their consumption of tuna due to concern
over mercury levels in fresh and canned tuna. The FDA already tells pregnant women not to eat four fish species that
contain the highest levels of mercury: shark, swordfish, king mackerel, and tilefish.
The FDA deems safe fish that contain less than 1 part per million of methylmercury. The average commercial fish
contains 0.12 ppm, whicle canned tuna on average contains only slightly more than that, but amounts can vary to as much as
0.75 parts per million, the FDA said. The panel decided that the FDA should quickly research the health risk level of canned
tuna, and in the interim urge that pregnant women and young children limit their consumption to
two 6-ounce cans of tuna per week if that is the only fish they eat, or a single can per week if they also consume other seafood
(advice modeled off that from Wisconsin's state fish advisory).
The panel also urged the FDA to work more closely with the EPA and states issuing advice
that takes into account recreationally caught fish, and to do a better job of educating women about what seafood they
should eat.
Source: Lauran Neergaard. Friday, July 26, 2002. The Washington Post
- Ohio Cuts Fish Advisory Program -
The Ohio Department of Health abolished its fish consumption advisory program in July, after
the department was told to cut $12.3 million from its budget as part
of state budget cuts. Eliminating the fish advisory program will save the state approximately
$100,000. Ohio is the first Great Lakes state to eliminate a fish advisory program, although Michigan
drastically cut funding to its program earlier this year. The Ohio EPA will continue to assess fish samples to
evaluate which waterways are meeting goals of the federal Clean Water Act, but the
Health Department will no longer assess the effect of contamination on humans who eat the fish, nor will
the state continue to print consumption advisories on posters and brochures given to anglers
when they buy fishing licenses. Warnings based on data collected over the past five years
will remain on the Ohio
Department of Health Web site.
UPDATE: On August 2, another article in the Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that
Ohio is reconsidering eliminating the fish advisory program, and might reinstate
the program next summer. U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich demanded August 1 that the state keep the program and even expand it.
Kucinich said his staff will research the issue and draft legislation. He proposed making advisories mandatory and having the
federal government set uniform standards for all states to follow. "I'm not saying don't eat the fish, but people have a right to
know if they consume certain quantities of fish if it will have an adverse effect to their health," Kucinich said.
Source: John C. Kuehner. July 31, 2002. The fish are still not safe to eat, but state no
longer will tell you. The Cleveland Plain Dealer.
Source: John C. Kuehner. August 2, 2002. State reconsidering end of fish-eating advisories.
The Cleveland Plain Dealer.
Current Events, News and Journal Articles
- EPA Study: Health Risks for Columbia Basin Native Americans Consuming Fish -
An EPA study into tribal health risks related to fish consumption, which began in 1989 as a partnership with the Columbia River
Inter-Tribal Fish Commission, has recently been completed. EPA and tribal researchers from 4 tribes in Washington, Oregon and Idaho
found that tribal adults eat up to 48 fish meals a month, and that the tribes as a whole eat fish at rates 6 to 11 times that of the national average.
The study also measured contamination of both resident fish and migratory fish, such as coho, chinook and steelhead.
The fish were analyzed for 132 chemicals, including pesticides, metals and organic pollutants. The most frequently detected
contaminants were metals, PCBs, banned pesticides such as DDT, and dioxins.
For Native Americans eating the most migratory species, the risk of developing cancer ranged from 7
cases in every 10,000 people to 2 in 1,000, while people eating large amounts of long-lived resident fish, such as sturgeon,
had a 2-in-100 risk of cancer at some locations. Regulatory agencies generally take steps to protect the public when the risk falls between 1 in a million and
1 in 10,000. The Washington Health Department hasn't issued any health advisories on fish consumption for the
Columbia, but it has made recommendations for safer food preparation and is redesigning its fish advisory
program to tell people how much of a certain fish they can safely eat, rather than looking at risk based on
average consumption rates. In response to the study, Columbia Basin tribes are forming task forces and continuing
research to determine individual health risks, as well as how best to communicate the information with their members. A
Yakama Nation study is being done to calculate if tribal members have higher cancer rates.
Source: Lisa Stiffler. July 31, 2002. Toxic fish imperil tribes. Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
- Dioxins, Furans, and Dioxin-like PCBs in Arctic and Antarctic Animals -
This study measured concentrations of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins (PCDDs), dibenzofurans (DFs), and
dioxin-like PCBs in livers of polar bears from the Alaskan Arctic and in eggs of Adelie penguin and south polar
skua and weddell seal liver, fish and krill from Antarctica. Concentrations of total PCDD/DFs in livers of polar
bears ranged from 8 to 66 pg/g. Concentrations of total PCDD/DFs in Antarctic samples were lowest in weddell
seal liver (8.9 pg/g) and highest in south polar skua eggs (mean: 181 pg/g). Concentrations of dioxin-like PCBs in
polar bear livers were in the range of 1080-3930 ng/g. Concentrations of dioxin-like PCBs in Antarctic samples
were lowest in krill (0.9 ng/g) and highest in south polar skua eggs (mean: 1440 ng/g). 23478-PeCDF was one
of the dominant congeners found in several samples. Concentrations of TEQs in polar
bear livers and skua eggs were close to those that may cause adverse health effects.
Source: K. S. Kumar, Kannan K., Corsolini S., Evans T., Giesy J. P., Nakanishi J.,
Masunaga S. 2002. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans and polychlorinated
biphenyls in polar bear, penguin and south polar skua. Environmental Pollution.
Vol. 119(2):151-161.
- Importance of Weight-Normalized Exposure Data for Fish Advisories -
In this paper the author argues that, without weight-normalized consumption pattern
]data to determine exposure, health assessment conclusions can potentially mislead the
public. His study provides evidence that weight-normalized, species-specific,
individual-consumption pattern data are vital for
determining exposure levels used to ascertain health protection measures
and impacts from consuming contaminated fish. The study demonstrates the
importance of adequate consumption pattern data for determining exposure
distributions used for public health protection by examining three
populations exposed to methylmercury through fish consumption: one
recreational angler population and two Native-American populations.
The author also conducted sensitivity analyses and population-specific
probabilistic assessments of exposure. Results presented in this study
indicate that weight-adjusted intake values for a population of concern
are warranted when determining exposure distributions and should not be
neglected in a health assessment.
Source: Marien, Koenraad. 2002. The importance of weight-normalized exposure data when issuing fish
advisories for protection of public health. Environ Health Perspect 2002 Jul. Vol 110(7):671-7.
- Metal Levels in Fish From the Savannah River -
This study reports on the concentrations of arsenic, cadmium,
chromium, copper, lead, manganese, strontium(88) and mercury in the muscle tissue
of 11 species of fish from the Savannah River (near the Savannah River
Site). The researchers found that higher trophic level fish generally had higher
levels of arsenic, chromium, and copper. The relationships between body weight and
contaminant levels were generally positive, except for strontium, where there was a
negative correlation for bowfin, bass, yellow perch, and shellcracker and no
relationship for the other species. The levels of most metals were similar to or
lower than levels for the United States generally, and the levels do not appear to
pose a health threat to the fish themselves or to higher-order consumers.
Source: J. Burger, Gaines KF, Boring CS, Stephens WL, Snodgrass J, Dixon C, McMahon M
Shukla S, Shukla T, Gochfeld M. 2002. Metal levels in fish from the Savannah River: potential hazards to fish
and other receptors.. Environ Res. Vol 89(1):85-97.
- Use of Factor Analysis to Identify Fish Consumption Patterns -
This paper reports on the use of factor analysis to identify sport fish consumption
patterns in Great Lakes angler families. New York State recreational anglers and their
spouses were surveyed in 1991 about their consumption of Lake Ontario and Lake Erie sport
fish. Respondents were surveyed again in 1997 regarding sport fish consumption by their
children aged 5-10 years. Parental reports revealed that 60% of children had consumed at
least one sport fish meal over their lifetime. The authors found significant associations
between parental and children's factors, suggesting that sport fish consumption patterns
in parents are predictive of similar consumption patterns in children. The authors feel these
results suggest that sport fish consumption advisories do not fully prevent consumption of contaminated
sport fish during childhood.
Source: GP Beehler, Weiner JM, McCann SE, Vena JE, Sandberg DE. 2002. Identification
of Sport Fish Consumption Patterns in Families of Recreational Anglers through Factor Analysis.
Environ Res. Vol 89(1):19-28.
- Status and Trends of Contaminants in Oysters from the Carolinas -
This paper examines trends in oyster contaminant concentrations in North and South Carolina.
Contaminant concentrations at the 11 NOAA mussel watch project (MWP) sites located in
North and South Carolina were compared with the national US MWP data. Decreasing
temporal trends were found for As, Cd, total-chlordane, DDT, PCB, and PAHs
at some sites. Three sites from North and South Carolina had concentrations of
PAHs in the upper 15th percentile on a national scale. One site had high concentrations of
butyltins, and two sites had high Se concentrations. All sites from
Beaufort, North Carolina, south had high As concentrations.
Source: G.G. Lauenstein, Cantillo A.Y., O'Connor T.P. 2002. The status and trends of trace element and organic contaminants in
oysters, Crassostrea virginica, in the waters of the Carolinas, USA. Sci Total Environ. Vol 285(1-3):79-87.
- Maine Case Study: Management and Communication of Risk -
A survey of Maine women of childbearing age found that nearly 20% of respondents had hair
mercury levels in excess of those associated with U.S. EPA’s reference dose for
methylmercury. Survey data also indicate that the public's awareness of statewide fish
consumption advisories is low. As a result, the Maine Bureau of Health has launched
a new risk communication campaign employing focus groups to develop materials, using
targeted mailings, and partnering with health care providers to provide information
to the most at risk population. An important issue has been how to recommend limits
on eating fish because of mercury contamination while recommending increased consumption
because of the health benefits of eating fish.
Source: Smith, A. E. 2002. Management and communication of risk: The Maine experience.
Teratology. Vol 65(6):315
Meetings and Conferences
- 2002 National Forum on Contaminants in Fish
-
The 2002 National Forum on Contaminants in Fish, to be cosponsored by EPA and the American Fisheries Society, will be held October 20-22
, 2002 in Burlington, Vermont. More information will be coming soon to www.epa.gov/ost/fish and
www.fisheries.org.
- Society for Risk Analysis (SRA) Annual Meeting -
The annual meeting will be held at the New Orleans Marriott, December 8-11, 2002. For more information go to the SRA website.
- The Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) 2002 Annual Meeting -
SETAC's 23rd Annual Meeting will be held November 16-20 in Salt Lake City, Utah. The meeting theme is "Achieving Global
Environmental Quality: Integrating Science & Management." Abstracts are due by May 31. For more information visit the conference website:
http://www.setac.org/SLCcall.html.
- American Fisheries Society (AFS) 2002 Annual Meeting - To be held
August 18-22 in Baltimore, Maryland. For more information visit the
AFS website.
- Ecological Society of America 2002 Annual Meeting - The theme this
year is "Understanding and Restoring Ecosystems." To be held August 4-9, 2002 in Tucson, Arizona. For more information visit the ESA website.
Please email the newsletter if you would like to announce an upcoming meeting, conference, or to submit an article.
For More Information
For more information on EPA's Fish and Wildlife Contamination Program, contact:
Jeffrey Bigler at US EPA, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW (4305), Washington, DC 20460;
email: bigler.jeff@epa.gov.
email the newsletter
NLFWA HOME | OST HOME |
EPA HOME | WATER HOME
Revised August, 2002
|
|